Who's Online
6 user(s) are online ( 3 user(s) are browsing Articles, News and Announcements)
Members: 0
Guests: 6
more...
|
Big Story - Articles, News & Announcements There isn't a Biggest Story for Today, yet.
|
News & Developments from the IRS : Sample Plan Language - Transfer of an ESOP’s S Corporation Shares to Prevent a Nonallocation Year
|
| Posted by esopwebmaster on 2009/5/4 17:26:03 (249 reads) News by the same author |
|
employee plans news Volume 9 - Spring 2009
The IRS has posted sample plan language for ESOPs, which revises the language released in the July 1, 2008 Special Edition of Employee Plans News. The language may serve as part of a comprehensive set of plan provisions designed to prevent the occurrence of a nonallocation year. An 1120S corporation ESOP has a nonallocation year when disqualified persons are deemed to own 50% of the outstanding stock of the S corporation, taking into account synthetic equity. During a nonallocation year, disqualified persons may not accrue or be allocated any portion of plan assets consisting of employer securities. Such prohibited transactions in a nonallocation year are treated as deemed distributions from the plan. In addition, upon the occurrence of a nonallocation year, the S corporation is liable for a 50% tax applied to the disqualified persons’ synthetic equity and deemed owned shares. A nonallocation year may also cause the plan to be disqualified and the corporation’s tax status to be altered.
Sample Language for Section 409(p) Transfers - Non-ESOP Portion of Plan 1. Non-ESOP Portion. Assets held under the Plan in accordance with this Section are held under a portion of the Plan that is not an employee stock ownership plan (ESOP), within the meaning of section 4975(e)(7) of the Internal Revenue Code. Amounts held in the portion of the Plan that is not an ESOP (the Non-ESOP Portion) shall be held in accounts that are separate from the accounts for the amounts held in the remainder of the Plan (the ESOP Portion). Any statements provided to Participants and/or Beneficiaries to show their interest in the Plan shall separately identify the amounts held in each such portion. Except as specifically set forth in this Section, all of the terms of the Plan apply to any amount held under the Non-ESOP Portion of the Plan in the same manner and to the same extent as an amount held under the ESOP Portion of the Plan.
2. Transfers from ESOP Portion to Non-ESOP Portion of Plan to Avoid Nonallocation Years. (a) In the case of any event that the Plan Administrator determines would otherwise cause a nonallocation year (as defined in section xxx of the Plan) to occur (referred herein as a “nonallocation event”), shares of employer stock held under the Plan before the date of the nonallocation event shall be transferred from the ESOP portion of the Plan to the Non-ESOP portion of the Plan as provided in (2)(a). Events that may cause a nonallocation year include, but are not limited to, a contribution to the Plan in the form of shares of employer stock, a distribution from the Plan in the form of shares of employer stock, a change of investment within a Plan account of a disqualified person (as defined in section xxx of the Plan) that alters the number of shares of employer stock held in the account of the disqualified person, or the issuance by the employer of synthetic equity as defined by section 409(p)(6)(C) of the Internal Revenue Code and section 1.409(p)-1(f) of the Treasury Regulations. A nonallocation event occurs only if (i) the total number of shares of employer stock that, held in the ESOP account of those Participants who are or who would be disqualified persons after taking into account the Participant’s synthetic equity and the nonallocation event exceeds (ii) the number of shares of employer stock equal to 49.9% of the total number of shares of employer stock outstanding after taking the nonallocation event into account (causing a nonallocation year to occur as described in Section xxx of the Plan). The amount transferred under this section shall be the amount that the Administrator determines to be the minimum amount that is necessary to ensure that a nonallocation year does not occur, but in no event is the amount so transferred to be less than the excess of (i) over (ii). The Administrator shall take steps to ensure that all actions necessary to implement the transfer are taken before the nonallocation event occurs.
[The plan may provide for a stated percentage not less than 40% instead of 49.9% as used in (ii) above. If this is chosen use the following language instead of the above section:
2. Transfers from ESOP Portion to Non-ESOP Portion of Plan to Avoid Nonallocation Year. (a) In the case of any event (referred herein as a “nonallocation event”) that the Plan Administrator determines would otherwise cause the total number of shares of employer stock held in the ESOP account of those Participants who are or who would be disqualified persons after taking into account the Participant’s synthetic equity and the nonallocation event to exceed the number of shares of employer stock equal to [a stated percentage not less than 40% but not exceeding 49%] of the total number of shares of employer stock outstanding, shares of employer stock held under the Plan before the date of the nonallocation event, shall be transferred from the ESOP Portion of the Plan to the Non-ESOP Portion of the Plan as provided in this section. Actions that may cause a nonallocation event, include, but are not limited to, a contribution to the Plan in the form of shares of employer stock, a distribution from the Plan in the form of shares of employer stock, a change of investment within a Plan account of a disqualified person (as defined in section xxx of the Plan) that alters the number of shares of employer stock held in the account of the disqualified person, or the issuance by the employer of synthetic equity as defined by section 409(p)(6)(C) of the Internal Revenue Code and section 1.409(p)-1(f) of the Treasury Regulations. A nonallocation event occurs only if (i) the total number of shares of employer stock that, held in the ESOP account of those Participants who are or who would be disqualified persons after taking into account the Participant’s synthetic equity and the nonallocation event, exceeds (ii) the number of shares of employer stock equal to [the previously stated percentage] of the total number of shares of employer stock outstanding after taking the nonallocation event into account. The amount transferred under this section shall be the amount that the Administrator determines to be the minimum amount that is necessary to ensure that no nonallocation event occurs, but in no event is the amount so transferred to be less than the excess of (i) over (ii). The Administrator shall take steps to ensure that all actions necessary to implement the transfer are taken before the nonallocation event occurs.]
(b)(1) Except as provided for in (b)(2), at the date of the transfer, the total number of shares transferred, as provided for in (a)(1), shall be charged against the accounts of Participants who are disqualified persons (i) by first reducing the ESOP account of the Participant who is a disqualified person whose account has the largest number of shares (with the addition of synthetic equity shares) and (ii) thereafter by reducing the ESOP accounts of each succeeding Participant who is a disqualified person who has the largest number of shares in his or her their account (with the addition of synthetic equity shares). Immediately following the transfer, the number of transferred shares charged against any Participant’s account in the ESOP portion of the Plan shall be credited to an account established for that Participant in the Non-ESOP portion of the Plan.
(2) Notwithstanding (b)(1), the number of shares transferred shall be charged against the accounts of Participants who are disqualified persons (i) by first reducing the account of the Participant with the fewest shares (including synthetic equity shares) who is a disqualified person and who is a Highly Compensated Employee (as defined in Section xxx of the Plan) to cause the Participant not to be a disqualified person, and (ii) thereafter reducing the account of each other Participant who is a disqualified person and a Highly Compensated Employee, in order of who has the fewest ESOP shares (including synthetic equity shares). A transfer under this (b)(2) only applies to the extent that the transfer results in fewer shares being transferred than in a transfer under (b)(1).
(c) (1) If two or more Participants described in (b) have the same number of shares, the account of the Participant with the longest service shall be reduced first.
(2) Beneficiaries of the Plan are treated as Plan Participants for purposes of this section.
3. Income Taxes. If the Trust owes income taxes as a result of unrelated business taxable income under section 512(e) of the Internal Revenue Code with respect to shares of employer stock held in the Non-ESOP portion of the Plan, the income tax payments made by the Trustee shall be charged against the accounts of each Participant or Beneficiary who has an account in the Non-ESOP portion of the Plan in proportion to the ratio of the shares of employer stock in such Participant’s or Beneficiary’s account in the non-ESOP portion of the Plan to the total shares of employer stock in the non-ESOP portion of the Plan. The Employer shall purchase shares of employer stock from the Trustee with cash (based on the fair market value of the shares so purchased) from each such account to the extent cash is not otherwise available to make the income tax payments from the Participant’s or Beneficiary’s ESOP accounts or his or her other defined contribution plan accounts.
|
|
| Bookmark this article at these sites |
|
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.
Top Articles, News & Announcements
|
Request for Technical Assistance (#1) Posted by esopwebmaster
(32)
|
| MEMORANDUM FOR DANIEL R. JONES, MANAGER, EMPLOYEE PLANS DETERMINATIONS QUALITY ASSURANCE
FROM: Andrew E. Zuckerman, Director, Employee Plans Rulings and Agreements SUBJECT: Request for Technical Assistance (#1)
This Memorandum is in response to your Request for Technical Assistance, dated March 6, 2009, concerning immediate resale provisions in employee stock ownership plans (within the meaning of Internal Revenue Code section 4975(e)(7)) and Internal Revenue Code section 409(h).
Issues 1. Whether a distribution from an employee stock ownership plan (“ESOP”) of stock that is subject to an immediate resale provision meets the requirements of Internal Revenue Code (“Code”) section 409(h), specifically the put option requirement of Code section 409(h)(1)(B).
2. Whether the immediate resale provisions set forth in Rev. Proc. 2003-23, as modified by Rev. Proc. 2004-14, may be applied to any distributions of stock from an ESOP or are limited solely to situations involving the rollover of S corporation stock from an S corporation ESOP to an IRA.
3. Whether distributions from an ESOP of stock that is subject to immediate resale provisions, in the case of a plan under which the trustee or plan administrator has discretion to determine which participants will receive distributions in cash and which participants will receive distributions in the form of employer securities, violates the nondiscrimination requirements of the Code. |
|
|
-
[363]
Great ESOP Reading!
Just Published - "ESOP Forever" a book about the sustainable ESOP by acclaimed ESOP financial expert Thomas G. King, financial consultant to the design and implementation of America's first S corporation ESOP. The book is available in both paperback and hardcover format through AuthorHouse Publishing at www.authorhouse.com
-
[337]
DOL issues Guidance on ERISA Fidelity Bonding Requirements
The Department of Labor released Field Assistance Bulletin 2008-4 on November 25, 2008 to provide guidance on ERISA Fidelity Bonding Requirements. This Bulletin provides guidance, in a question and answer format, concerning the application of ERISAs bonding requirements and the Pension Protection Act changes. As of January 1, 2006, the maximum required bond ceiling was increased to $1,000,000. A full copy of the Bulletin is available via the downloads section of www.ESOP.US
-
[304]
Fiduciary Investigations Program
The United States Department of Labor Employee Benefits Security Administration Fiduciary Investigations Program
1. Statutory Requirements. The Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) expressly confers upon the Secretary direct responsibility and authority to investigate fiduciary violations of Title I of ERISA. In accordance with that authority, Program 48 will be used to investigate violations involving ERISA, Title I, part 4, sections 402, "Establishment of plan," 403, "Establishment of trust," 404, "Fiduciary duties," 405, "Liability for breach of co-fiduciary," 406, "Prohibited Transactions," 407, "10 percent limitation with respect to acquisition and holding of employer securities and employer real property by certain plans," 409, "Liability for breach...
-
[263]
NCEO/Beyster Institute 2009 Employee Ownership Conference
The 2009 Employee Ownership Conference, presented by the NCEO and the Beyster Institute, will take place in Portland, Oregon, on April 22-24, 2009 at the Hilton Portland and Executive Towers. We hope to see you there!
What to Expect: The conference provides learning and networking opportunities plus the flexibility to choose sessions from a wide range of subjects and levels of complexity. Daily general sessions draw attendees together for informative and inspiring updates on the world of employee ownership, but the rest of the program is up to you!
Who Should Attend? Anyone interested or involved in equity sharing as an effective business strategy will benefit from attending this event, including company presidents, owners, CEOs, executives, directors, managers,...
-
[263]
ESOP.US launches ESOP Connections - Networking for the ESOP Community
April 30, 2009 ESOP.US launches ESOP Connections - Networking for the ESOP Community
ESOP.US, the website for the ESOP community is pleased to announce the launch of “ESOP Connections.” ESOP Connections is an online business and social networking service for the ESOP community that functions in a manner similar to other popular internet social networking services such as My Space, Face Book, and Linked-in, but with a specific focus upon the ESOP Community – Companies with employee stock ownership plans, ESOP employees and participants, and the professionals who advise them. To use this feature, users must first register as a website user – a free service. Once registered, a user may then create a profile, and then they may use the features of this service to...
-
[260]
Past President and CFO of California Company Sentenced to Prison for Embezzlement and Tax Evasion
On November 3, 2008, in Sacramento, Calif., Peggy Kaye Witts, of Redding, Calif., was sentenced to 46 months in prison and ordered to pay $824,333 in restitution to the Voorwood Company and $199,858 to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) for federal wire fraud and tax evasion. Witts pleaded guilty in July 2008 admitting that, as Voorwood’s president, she engaged in a scheme to defraud the company by issuing duplicate paychecks to herself for more than four years and by issuing company checks to herself, family members, and others for her personal expenses. She also admitted to tax evasion based on her failure to report the embezzled money as income and to pay taxes on the money. She was ordered to turn over to the Voorwood Company, in partial satisfaction of her restitution obligation,...
-
[255]
ESOP as a solution to the Credit Crunch
Current economic conditions and the bank lending environment have made it difficult for many business owners to implement business succession plans involving a sale of their ownership interest to current partners, younger management and employees. The ESOP may be the solution. In implementing an ESOP, one financing option is for the ESOP to issue a debt instrument to the selling owner, repayable via fully tax deductible payments over a term of up to 10 years.
-
[249]
Sample Plan Language - Transfer of an ESOP’s S Corporation Shares to Prevent a Nonallocation Year
employee plans news Volume 9 - Spring 2009
The IRS has posted sample plan language for ESOPs, which revises the language released in the July 1, 2008 Special Edition of Employee Plans News. The language may serve as part of a comprehensive set of plan provisions designed to prevent the occurrence of a nonallocation year. An 1120S corporation ESOP has a nonallocation year when disqualified persons are deemed to own 50% of the outstanding stock of the S corporation, taking into account synthetic equity. During a nonallocation year, disqualified persons may not accrue or be allocated any portion of plan assets consisting of employer securities. Such prohibited transactions in a nonallocation year are treated as deemed distributions from the plan. In addition, upon the...
-
[242]
IRS Final Sec. 108 Regulations Apply to Losses allocable to ESOP Shareholder
The IRS issued final regulations regarding Section 108 - Reduction of Tax Attributes for S Corporations, and the IRS preamble to the final regulations confirms that disallowed losses and deductions under section 1366(d)(1) of a shareholder that is an employee stock ownership plan (ESOP) are included in the S corporation’s deemed NOL. The IRS stated position is that Section 108(d)(7)(B) provides that any loss or deduction that is disallowed for the taxable year of the discharge under section 1366(d)(1) is treated as a deemed NOL of the S corporation. Accordingly, section 108(d)(7)(B) applies to any shareholder, including an ESOP shareholder, that has disallowed losses and deductions for the taxable year of the discharge under section 1366(d)(1).
-
[215]
COLA Increases for Dollar Limitations on Benefits and Contributions -
IR-2009-94, Oct. 15, 2009 - The Internal Revenue Service announced cost-of-living adjustments applicable to dollar limitations for pension plans and other items for tax year 2010.
Section 415 of the Internal Revenue Code provides for dollar limitations on benefits and contributions under qualified retirement plans. In addition, section 415 requires the Commissioner to annually adjust these limits for cost-of-living increases. Other limitations applicable to deferred compensation plans are also affected by these adjustments. The Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 (EGTRRA) reset many of the statutory dollar amounts previously adjusted on an annual basis under section 415 of the Internal Revenue Code. Additionally, other new limitation amounts were...
|
Topics - Articles, News & Announcements
Archives - Articles, News & Announcements
|
|